Waterman v. Morgan

S.D. New York

Waterman v. Morgan

29 F. Cas. 407

DecidedJuly 1, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 29 F. Cas. 407 (Waterman v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterman v. Morgan, 29 F. Cas. 407 (S.D.N.Y. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

HELD

BY THE COURT

[BETTS, District Judge]:

That the decree cannot be impeached by means of exceptions to the report. That the commissioner is bound to conform to the decree, and all errors in that must be rectified by rehearing on appeal. That the commissioner has properly estimated the proofs and made the proper charges and credits in the cause. Exceptions overruled, and report confirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HELD

BY THE COURT

[BETTS, District Judge]:

That the decree cannot be impeached by means of exceptions to the report. That the commissioner is bound to conform to the decree, and all errors in that must be rectified by rehearing on appeal. That the commissioner has properly estimated the proofs and made the proper charges and credits in the cause. Exceptions overruled, and report confirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. Cas. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-v-morgan-nysd-1856.