Waterman v. Morgan

S.D. New York

Waterman v. Morgan

29 F. Cas. 407

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 1, 1856·Published

Opinion

HELD

BY THE COURT

[BETTS, District Judge]:

That the decree cannot be impeached by means of exceptions to the report. That the commissioner is bound to conform to the decree, and all errors in that must be rectified by rehearing on appeal. That the commissioner has properly estimated the proofs and made the proper charges and credits in the cause. Exceptions overruled, and report confirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HELD

BY THE COURT

[BETTS, District Judge]:

That the decree cannot be impeached by means of exceptions to the report. That the commissioner is bound to conform to the decree, and all errors in that must be rectified by rehearing on appeal. That the commissioner has properly estimated the proofs and made the proper charges and credits in the cause. Exceptions overruled, and report confirmed, with costs.

Waterman v. Morgan, 29 F. Cas. 407 (S.D.N.Y. 1856).

Pincite

29 F. Cas. 407 (Waterman v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.