Waterman v. Johnson
This text of 271 A.D.2d 876 (Waterman v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motions are consolidated. Petitioner’s application and motion are denied, without costs. Bespondents’ cross motions to dismiss the petition are granted, without costs. The remedy invoked by petitioner is not available under the circumstances shown by this record. All the papers submitted on these motions are directed to be sealed. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Bolán, JJ. [See post, p. 984.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-v-johnson-nyappdiv-1946.