Waterman v. Green
59 Cal. 142
Opinion
The grain seized under the attachment was three miles away from the land of the mortgagor. By a former statute it was provided that the lien of a mortgage upon a growing crop should cease when the crop was harvested. Held, that the lien ceased when the crop was severed from the land. (Goodyear v. Williston, 42 Cal. 11.)
Section 2972 of the Civil Code keeps alive the lien of such a mortgage upon a crop only “so long as the same remains on the land of the mortgagor.”
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waterman v. Green, 59 Cal. 142 (Cal. 1881).
59 Cal. 142 (Waterman v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horgan v. Zanetta
40 P. 22 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Byrnes v. Hatch
19 P. 482 (California Supreme Court, 1888)