Waterman v. Green

California Supreme Court

Waterman v. Green

59 Cal. 142

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1881

DocketNo. 7,197

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 Cal. 142 (Waterman v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterman v. Green, 59 Cal. 142 (Cal. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court:

The grain seized under the attachment was three miles away from the land of the mortgagor. By a former statute it was provided that the lien of a mortgage upon a growing crop should cease when the crop was harvested. Held, that the lien ceased when the crop was severed from the land. (Goodyear v. Williston, 42 Cal. 11.)

Section 2972 of the Civil Code keeps alive the lien of such a mortgage upon a crop only “so long as the same remains on the land of the mortgagor.”

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court:

The grain seized under the attachment was three miles away from the land of the mortgagor. By a former statute it was provided that the lien of a mortgage upon a growing crop should cease when the crop was harvested. Held, that the lien ceased when the crop was severed from the land. (Goodyear v. Williston, 42 Cal. 11.)

Section 2972 of the Civil Code keeps alive the lien of such a mortgage upon a crop only “so long as the same remains on the land of the mortgagor.”

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cal. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-v-green-cal-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack