Waterman v. Glisson
This text of 42 S.E. 95 (Waterman v. Glisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where suit for breach of a warranty was brought against a-partnership alleged to be composed of three persons, and one of them filed a plea in his individual capacity, denying that he as an individual ever made the warranty sued on, but not denying that he was a member of the partnership or showing facts which would relieve the partnership of liability, such plea was properly stricken on motion.
:2. It was not error to reject an unsworn amendment to such plea, denying the existence of the partnership and the pleader’s membership therein. Civil Code, § 2637.
3. Under the act creating the city court of Bainbridge, it is not necessary to take the verdict of a jury except where a jury is demanded, even though the suit be for unliquidated damages.
•4. A count in a declaration, alleging in substance that the defendant had acted in bad faith and had been stubbornly litigious and had caused the plaintiff unnecessary trouble and expense, may be joined with a count on breach of warranty ; and if the amounts claimed in the two counts aggregate more than fifty dollars, this will, as against a motion in arrest of judgment, give jurisdiction of the suit to a court having jurisdiction only of suits for more than fifty dollars.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 95, 115 Ga. 773, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-v-glisson-ga-1902.