Waterman v. Byrne
This text of 7 A.D.2d 971 (Waterman v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by appellants, Henry Kaufman, Saul Sehatten, Fanny Kalmanowitz and Sehatten Equities, Inc., to dispense with printing denied, without costs, with leave, however, to renew upon proper papers showing in detail the size of the record, and the cost of printing and defendants’ financial condition. Concur — Botein, P. J., M. M. Frank, Valente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 971, 186 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-v-byrne-nyappdiv-1959.