Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Fifth Circuit

Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

166 F.2d 1021, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1948

DocketNo. 11765

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 1021 (Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 166 F.2d 1021, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390 (5th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, in cause No. 11765, between Waterman Steamship Corporation, petitioner, and Civil Aeronautics Boai-d, respondent, and Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc., Intervener, a judgment was entered by this Court on February 14, 1947, 159 F.2d 828, denying the motions of the respondent and intervener to dismiss the petition for review; and Whereas, on February 9, 1948, the Supreme Court of the United States, 68 S.Ct. 431, reversed the judgment of this Court and issued its mandate to this Court remanding the cause for proceedings in conformity with the opinion of said Supreme Court: it is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the petition of the Waterman Steamship Corporation for a review of the order of the Civil Aeronautics Board be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, in cause No. 11765, between Waterman Steamship Corporation, petitioner, and Civil Aeronautics Boai-d, respondent, and Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc., Intervener, a judgment was entered by this Court on February 14, 1947, 159 F.2d 828, denying the motions of the respondent and intervener to dismiss the petition for review; and Whereas, on February 9, 1948, the Supreme Court of the United States, 68 S.Ct. 431, reversed the judgment of this Court and issued its mandate to this Court remanding the cause for proceedings in conformity with the opinion of said Supreme Court: it is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the petition of the Waterman Steamship Corporation for a review of the order of the Civil Aeronautics Board be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 1021, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-steamship-corp-v-civil-aeronautics-board-ca5-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack