Waterman Bldg. Co. v. Rose
130 N.Y.S. 1134
This text of 130 N.Y.S. 1134 (Waterman Bldg. Co. v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Waterman Bldg. Co. v. Rose, 130 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
The allegations in the affidavits upon which the warrant of attachment was granted are wholly insufficient, and’ the motion to vacate the same should have been granted. Order reversed, with costs, and motion to vacate attachment granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterman-bldg-co-v-rose-nyappterm-1911.