Waterhouse v. Gilman

New York Court of Common Pleas

Waterhouse v. Gilman

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283

DecidedApril 4, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283 (Waterhouse v. Gilman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterhouse v. Gilman, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Daly, J.

No evidence was given by defendant of any personal transaction with the plaintiff’s intestate. Testimony as to transactions with the agent of the latter was not objectionable. The cases cited by the appellant on this motion do not touch the questions involved by the ruling complained of. Lerche v. Brasher, 4 N. Y. State R., 335,

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied with ten dollars costs.

Larremore, C. J., and Van Hoesen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly, J.

No evidence was given by defendant of any personal transaction with the plaintiff’s intestate. Testimony as to transactions with the agent of the latter was not objectionable. The cases cited by the appellant on this motion do not touch the questions involved by the ruling complained of. Lerche v. Brasher, 4 N. Y. State R., 335,

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied with ten dollars costs.

Larremore, C. J., and Van Hoesen, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterhouse-v-gilman-nyctcompl-1887.