Waterhouse v. Gilman

New York Court of Common Pleas

Waterhouse v. Gilman

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided April 4, 1887·Published

Opinion

Daly, J.

No evidence was given by defendant of any personal transaction with the plaintiff’s intestate. Testimony as to transactions with the agent of the latter was not objectionable. The cases cited by the appellant on this motion do not touch the questions involved by the ruling complained of. Lerche v. Brasher, 4 N. Y. State R., 335,

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied with ten dollars costs.

Larremore, C. J., and Van Hoesen, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly, J.

No evidence was given by defendant of any personal transaction with the plaintiff’s intestate. Testimony as to transactions with the agent of the latter was not objectionable. The cases cited by the appellant on this motion do not touch the questions involved by the ruling complained of. Lerche v. Brasher, 4 N. Y. State R., 335,

Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals denied with ten dollars costs.

Larremore, C. J., and Van Hoesen, J., concur.

Waterhouse v. Gilman, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 283 (Waterhouse v. Gilman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.