Home/New York Court of Appeals/Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.

Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.

371 N.E.2d 533, 43 N.Y.2d 657, 400 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2480
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 10, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 371 N.E.2d 533 (Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co., 371 N.E.2d 533, 43 N.Y.2d 657, 400 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2480 (N.Y. 1977).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order modified, with costs to respondent to the extent of excusing compliance with the subpoena for 30 days from the date hereof and, as so modified, affirmed. Question certified answered in the affirmative. (See Matter of Standard Fruit & S. S. Co. v Waterfront Comm, of N. Y. Harbor, 43 NY2d 11, decided herewith.)

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenbaum v. Lefrak Corp.
80 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 N.E.2d 533, 43 N.Y.2d 657, 400 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterfront-commission-of-new-york-harbor-v-standard-fruit-steamship-co-ny-1977.