Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 12, 2009
Docket2009-UP-088
StatusUnpublished

This text of Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes (Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes, (S.C. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Waterford Place Homeowners Association of Lexington, Inc., Respondent,

v.

Richie D. Barnes, Appellant.


Appeal From Lexington County
James O. Spence, Master-in-Equity


Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-088
Submitted February 2, 2009 – Filed February 12, 2009   


AFFIRMED


Richie D. Barnes, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Walter B. Todd, Jr. and J. Derrick Jackson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Richie D. Barnes appeals the master-in-equity's award of attorney's fees and damages, arguing the master abused his discretion in hearing the matter and erred in awarding attorney's fees and damages.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR ("The Court of Appeals need not address a point with is manifestly without merit."); State v. Tyndall, 336 S.C. 8, 16, 518 S.E.2d 278, 282 (Ct. App. 1999) ("Conclusory arguments constitute an abandonment of the issue on appeal."); Solomon v. City Realty Co., 262 S.C. 198, 201, 203 S.E.2d 435, 436 (1974) (holding an issue is abandoned on appeal if argued in an incorrect single conclusory statement that leaves the error assigned unargued).

AFFIRMED.[1]

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solomon v. CITY REALTY COMPANY
203 S.E.2d 435 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)
State v. Tyndall
518 S.E.2d 278 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterford-place-homeowners-association-v-barnes-scctapp-2009.