Waterfall Economidis v. Pima County Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Waterfall Economidis v. Pima County Arizona

99 P.3d 15, 209 Ariz. 200

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 26, 2004

DocketNo. CV-04-0161-PR

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 P.3d 15 (Waterfall Economidis v. Pima County Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterfall Economidis v. Pima County Arizona, 99 P.3d 15, 209 Ariz. 200 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDERED: Application of American Council of Engineering Companies of Arizona and Arizona Builders’ Alliance for Permission to file Brief as Amicus Curiae = GRANTED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Petition for Review (Oral Argument Requested) = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

FURTHER ORDERED: Request for Attorneys’ Fees [Appellee Waterfall, Economi-dis] = DENIED.

FURTHER ORDERED: Request for Attorneys’ Fees [Appellant Pima County] = DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI