Waterbury v. Waterbury

New York Supreme Court

Waterbury v. Waterbury

27 N.Y.S. 1114, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 51, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 289

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 12, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 1114 (Waterbury v. Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterbury v. Waterbury, 27 N.Y.S. 1114, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 51, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 289 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

We think the affidavit of plaintiff was sufficiént to call upon the court to exercise its discretion, and that will suffice to give jurisdiction. In opposition to the motion, to vacate the attachment, the plaintiff argues that the moving papers do not show a valid "attachment' in favor of the subsequent creditor. As we are of opinion that plaintiff’s papers are sufficient, we are not compelled to analyze those of the Subsequent creditors. • Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

We think the affidavit of plaintiff was sufficiént to call upon the court to exercise its discretion, and that will suffice to give jurisdiction. In opposition to the motion, to vacate the attachment, the plaintiff argues that the moving papers do not show a valid "attachment' in favor of the subsequent creditor. As we are of opinion that plaintiff’s papers are sufficient, we are not compelled to analyze those of the Subsequent creditors. • Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.Y.S. 1114, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 51, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterbury-v-waterbury-nysupct-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack