Waterbury v. Marusiak
280 A.D.2d 947, 720 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1106
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2001
StatusPublished
This text of 280 A.D.2d 947 (Waterbury v. Marusiak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Waterbury v. Marusiak, 280 A.D.2d 947, 720 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
—Appeal [948]*948unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Ellingsworth v City of Watertown, 113 AD2d 1013, 1014). (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Court, Hafner, Jr., J. — Default Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ellingsworth v. City of Watertown
113 A.D.2d 1013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 947, 720 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterbury-v-marusiak-nyappdiv-2001.