Waterbury v. Delafield

New York Supreme Court

Waterbury v. Delafield

1 Cai. Cas. 513, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 324

DecidedFebruary 15, 1804

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 513 (Waterbury v. Delafield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterbury v. Delafield, 1 Cai. Cas. 513, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 324 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS was theprincipal fuit in feveral a ¿Hons on a policy of Infurance, in which a confolidation rule had been granted. A commiffion to examine had been taken out, titled in a confolidated caufe ; in the commiffion, the defendant joined and titled his crofs interrogatories in the fame manner.

Hoffman moved to read, in the principal caufe, the evidence taken under commiffion, titled in that which had been confolidated. The court, after fome words by Pendleton in oppofition, granted the motion, with colts to abide the event of the fuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS was theprincipal fuit in feveral a ¿Hons on a policy of Infurance, in which a confolidation rule had been granted. A commiffion to examine had been taken out, titled in a confolidated caufe ; in the commiffion, the defendant joined and titled his crofs interrogatories in the fame manner.

Hoffman moved to read, in the principal caufe, the evidence taken under commiffion, titled in that which had been confolidated. The court, after fome words by Pendleton in oppofition, granted the motion, with colts to abide the event of the fuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cai. Cas. 513, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterbury-v-delafield-nysupct-1804.