Waterall v. Waterall
This text of 109 So. 2d 675 (Waterall v. Waterall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling demurrer to a bill in equity.
The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the brief of appellant was not filed within the time prescribed by Supreme Court Rule 12, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. The motion is well taken.
Supreme Court Rule 12 provides: “Counsel for appellant shall file his brief with the clerk of this court within thirty days after the transcript of the record has been filed in this court. Upon failure to so file, the appeal shall be dismissed or the case affirmed, as the case may be”.
Prior to the adoption of Revised Rule 47 on the 17th day of February, 1956 (263 Ala. XXII), Rule 12 was held not to apply to cases having a preferred standing on appeal to this court. Terry v. State ex rel. Pettus, 264 Ala. 133, 85 So.2d 449, construing old Rule 47. ITowever, old Rule 47 was substituted by Revised Rule 47, supra, and cases of the status here considered are also governed by Rule 12. See Phalen v. Fort, 266 Ala. 213, 95 So.2d 401 and Tipton v. Tipton, 267 Ala. 64, 100 So.2d 14.
Motion granted.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 So. 2d 675, 268 Ala. 594, 1959 Ala. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterall-v-waterall-ala-1959.