Water Supervision Co. v. Empire Holding Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Water Supervision Co. v. Empire Holding Co.

159 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 1149 (Water Supervision Co. v. Empire Holding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Water Supervision Co. v. Empire Holding Co., 159 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued for services rendered pursuant to a contract. It failed to prove that the contract was signed by a person thereto duly authorized by the defendant, or that it had been ratified, or even that any services had been rendered. The complaint was properly dismissed, but the dismissal should not have been on the merits. Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the words “upon the merits,” and as so modified, affirmed, without costs of the appeal to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued for services rendered pursuant to a contract. It failed to prove that the contract was signed by a person thereto duly authorized by the defendant, or that it had been ratified, or even that any services had been rendered. The complaint was properly dismissed, but the dismissal should not have been on the merits. Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the words “upon the merits,” and as so modified, affirmed, without costs of the appeal to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/water-supervision-co-v-empire-holding-co-nyappdiv-1916.