Water Right & Electrical Co. v. Kaercher

200 Misc. 1107, 109 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2654
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 28, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bookstein, J.

It is true that the commissioners are “ to hear, consider and determine upon all claims which may be presented to them under the provisions of this article.” (Administrative Code of City of New York, § K41-12.0.) They are limited, however, to a finding of the value of the claimant’s property taken by eminent domain. They are not empowered to hear and determine title to property. (See unreported opinion of Mr. Justice Foster, Sup. Ct., Ulster Co., April 33, 1944, in Matter of Gillespie Rondout Riparian Section 2, Ulster Co. Parcel No. 48 [TVenig].)

Orderly procedure requires that the question of title should first be determined in an appropriate forum having jurisdiction to render a binding determination.

Under the circumstances here existing, it would be an abuse of discretion to grant the relief sought.

Petition dismissed, without costs.

Submit order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Water Right & Electrical Co. v. Kaercher, 200 Misc. 1107, 109 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2654 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1951).

200 Misc. 1107 (Water Right & Electrical Co. v. Kaercher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Huie
39 A.D.2d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)