Watel v. Richman
This text of 576 S.W.2d 779 (Watel v. Richman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a summary judgment case. The court of civil appeals correctly reversed and remanded for new trial. 565 S.W.2d 101. There are disputed issues of fact to be tried. Our action should not be interpreted, however, as approving the holding by the court of civil appeals that an express written warranty may not limit or exclude the implied warranties described in Humber v. Morton, 426 S.W.2d 554 (Tex.1968). We express no opinion on that question.
The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
576 S.W.2d 779, 22 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 73, 1978 Tex. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watel-v-richman-tex-1978.