Watco Companies, Inc. v. Campbell (Supreme Court)

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJune 8, 2018
Docket113156
StatusUnpublished

This text of Watco Companies, Inc. v. Campbell (Supreme Court) (Watco Companies, Inc. v. Campbell (Supreme Court)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watco Companies, Inc. v. Campbell (Supreme Court), (kan 2018).

Opinion

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 113,156

WATCO COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a SOUTH KANSAS AND OKLAHOMA RAILROAD, Appellant,

v.

SHANE CAMPBELL and JERRY STANDLEE, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in 52 Kan. App. 2d 602, 371 P.3d 360 (2016). Appeal from Crawford District Court, JEFFRY L. JACK, judge. Opinion filed June 8, 2018. Petition for review improvidently granted.

Kenneth E. Barnes, of The Barnes Law Firm, LLC, of Kansas City, Missouri, argued the cause, and Kyle S. Belew, of the same firm, and Daniel F. Church, of Morrow Willnauer Klosterman Church, LLC, of Kansas City, Missouri, were with him on the brief for appellant.

Dana M. Harris, of Harris & Hart, L.L.C., of Leawood, argued the cause, and Matthew W. Greenberg, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for appellees.

PER CURIAM: After granting the appellant Watco Companies, Inc.'s petition for review of an opinion by the Court of Appeals, this court heard oral argument on March 8, 2018. On March 9, 2018, this court issued an order directing the parties to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The appellant's responses are noted. The appellees did not respond. Having reviewed the record on file and the pleadings before this court, we conclude that the appellate courts have jurisdiction over this matter.

1 Having examined the opinion by the Court of Appeals and having considered the parties' arguments before this court, we determine the petition was improvidently granted. The Court of Appeals disposition of this case is final. See Rule 8.03(i)(1) (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 53).

Petition for review improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watco Companies, Inc. v. Campbell
371 P.3d 360 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Watco Companies, Inc. v. Campbell (Supreme Court), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watco-companies-inc-v-campbell-supreme-court-kan-2018.