Watchmaster Products, Div. of Bulova Watch Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Watchmaster Products, Div. of Bulova Watch Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 361, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1967

United States Customs Court·Decided April 18, 1966·No. C.D. 2656·Published

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, Judge:

When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Watchmaster Products, Div. of Bulova Watch Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 361, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1967 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

56 Cust. Ct. 361 (Watchmaster Products, Div. of Bulova Watch Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.