Watary Services Ltd. v. Law Kin Wah
This text of 247 A.D.2d 281 (Watary Services Ltd. v. Law Kin Wah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered January 31, 1997, awarding plaintiffs damages after granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint upon a default judgment rendered against defendant by a Hong Kong court, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
[282]*282The Hong Kong judgment is conclusive (CPLR 5302, 5303), and must be enforced absent a showing of one of the grounds for nonrecognition specified in CPLR 5304 (see, Matter of Fickling v Fickling, 210 AD2d 223). The grounds urged by defendant — that New York is an inconvenient forum and that necessary parties have not been joined in the New York action — do not fall within any of the grounds specified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D.2d 281, 668 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watary-services-ltd-v-law-kin-wah-nyappdiv-1998.