Watary Services Ltd. v. Law Kin Wah

247 A.D.2d 281, 668 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1998·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered January 31, 1997, awarding plaintiffs damages after granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint upon a default judgment rendered against defendant by a Hong Kong court, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[282]*282The Hong Kong judgment is conclusive (CPLR 5302, 5303), and must be enforced absent a showing of one of the grounds for nonrecognition specified in CPLR 5304 (see, Matter of Fickling v Fickling, 210 AD2d 223). The grounds urged by defendant — that New York is an inconvenient forum and that necessary parties have not been joined in the New York action — do not fall within any of the grounds specified.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watary Services Ltd. v. Law Kin Wah, 247 A.D.2d 281, 668 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 281 (Watary Services Ltd. v. Law Kin Wah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC v. Saad Trading, Contracting & Financial Services Co.
117 A.D.3d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation v. Carvel
736 F. Supp. 2d 730 (S.D. New York, 2010)
CIBC Mellon Trust Co. v. Mora Hotel Corp. N.V.
296 A.D.2d 81 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Lenchyshyn v. Pelko Electric, Inc.
281 A.D.2d 42 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)