Watanabe v. Thurber Street Associates Corp.

249 A.D.2d 991, 671 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5163

This text of 249 A.D.2d 991 (Watanabe v. Thurber Street Associates Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watanabe v. Thurber Street Associates Corp., 249 A.D.2d 991, 671 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence submitted by plaintiffs in the light most favorable to them, we conclude that it arguably raises a triable issue of fact. The motion of defendant Sutton Real Estate Co., Inc., for summary judgment therefore was properly denied (see, Ferrante v County of Nassau, 226 AD2d 1135; Smith v Key Bank, 206 AD2d 848, 849; Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845, 845-846). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Hayes, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hourigan v. McGarry
106 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Smith v. Key Bank of Western New York, N.A.
206 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Ferrante v. County of Nassau
226 A.D.2d 1135 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 991, 671 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watanabe-v-thurber-street-associates-corp-nyappdiv-1998.