Watanabe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Watanabe v. State

1923 OK CR 159, 215 P. 794, 24 Okla. Crim. 49, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 16, 1923

DocketNo. A-4198.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 159 (Watanabe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watanabe v. State, 1923 OK CR 159, 215 P. 794, 24 Okla. Crim. 49, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Payne county of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be imprisoned for 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered on December 7, 1921, and the appeal lodged in this court on February 3, 1922. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause when the same was submitted.

An examination of the pleadings, instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, reveals no reversible error.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed under Rule 9 (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x) of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Payne county of the offense of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be imprisoned for 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered on December 7, 1921, and the appeal lodged in this court on February 3, 1922. No brief has been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause when the same was submitted.

An examination of the pleadings, instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, reveals no reversible error.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed under Rule 9 (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x) of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 159, 215 P. 794, 24 Okla. Crim. 49, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watanabe-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.