Watamond Realty Corp. v. Schwartz

235 A.D. 700

This text of 235 A.D. 700 (Watamond Realty Corp. v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watamond Realty Corp. v. Schwartz, 235 A.D. 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted to the extent that appellant’s default in answering and in appearing on the trial is opened and the judgment in favor of plaintiff against this appellant, defendant, is vacated; with leave to appellant to serve an answer within ten days after the entry of the order herein, and to litigate with the plaintiff the question of the priority of its mechanic’s lien over that of the plaintiff’s mortgage. The foreclosure sale shah remain undisturbed, and the controversy shah involve only such sums as the plaintiff received as a result of such sale. The matter is remitted to Special Term for trial for the parties to proceed as they are advised under the limitations here imposed. This disposition is made on the ground that the facts were misrepresented to appellant’s attorney, thereby preventing the interposition of an answer; that it is doubtful that a notice of trial was served on the attorney for this defendant, who had made a general appearance; and that it has an apparently meritorious claim with a right to have the subject of its priority determined. (See Watamond Realty Corporation v. Schwartz, ante, p. 700, decided herewith.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watamond-realty-corp-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1932.