Waszkielewicz v. City of Buffalo

79 N.Y.2d 1039
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 12, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 79 N.Y.2d 1039 (Waszkielewicz v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waszkielewicz v. City of Buffalo, 79 N.Y.2d 1039 (N.Y. 1992).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from those portions of the Appellate Division order that dismissed plaintiffs claims against Burnwell Gas of Alden, Inc., Chemi-Trol Chemical Co., RegO Company, and Seimax Wholesale Supply Corp., and from those portions of the Appellate Division order that dismissed certain portions of plaintiffs claims against George D. Wilson, Jr., individually, George D. Wilson, Jr., doing business as Chimera Radiator Company and doing business as Chimera Hamburg Radiator Manufacturing Company, Chimera Radiator Manufacturing Co., Inc., George Wilson and Sons, Inc., Division Enterprises, Inc., L.B.G. Radiator Company, Inc., and Amherst Radiator Co., dismissed upon the ground that those portions of the order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Hancock, Jr., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 N.Y.2d 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waszkielewicz-v-city-of-buffalo-ny-1992.