Waste Disposal Litig. v. Dow Chemical Co.

101 F. App'x 514
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2004·No. 03-31104·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

*515 John Q. Smith ** (Smith) filed a complaint on behalf of the United States against Dow Chemical Co. (Dow), alleging that Dow required him and other employees to dump hazardous chemical residue from railroad tank cars in an unauthorized manner in violation of state and federal law. The district court granted Dow’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

Smith argues on appeal that the district court erred in granting Dow’s motion to dismiss. However, Smith has not provided a transcript of the record containing the reasons for the district court’s judgment. Therefore, this court will not consider this issue. See Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Dunham Concrete Prods., Inc., 475 F.2d 1241, 1251 (5th Cir.1973). Accordingly, Smith’s appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

**

The appellant is using the name "John Q. Smith” as an alias to maintain his anonymity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waste Disposal Litig. v. Dow Chemical Co., 101 F. App'x 514 (5th Cir. 2004).

101 F. App'x 514 (Waste Disposal Litig. v. Dow Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc.
475 F.2d 1241 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Powell v. Estelle
959 F.2d 22 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)