Waste Action Project v. Girard Resources & Recycling LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided June 6, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-00443·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 WASTE ACTION PROJECT, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-00443-RAJ-JRC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO 12 v. AMEND AND STRIKING SCHEDULING ORDER 13 GIRARD RESOURCES & RECYCLING LLC, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint, 17 naming an additional defendant, the City of Snoqualmie. Dkt. 26. The motion is unopposed, 18 which the Court deems an admission that the motion has merit. See LCR 7(b)(2). 19 The Court finds good cause to amend the scheduling order’s deadlines for joinder and for 20 amending pleadings in light of defendant’s lack of opposition and plaintiff’s explanation that it 21 was only after these deadlines that it learned of the City’s role in the allegations related to this 22 matter. See In re W. States Wholesale Nat. Gas Antitrust Litig., 715 F.3d 716, 737 (9th Cir. 23 2013). In addition, plaintiff asserts that it had to wait 60 days after serving a notice of intent to 24 1 sue on April 19, 2022, under a statutory notice provision, before it may file a complaint naming 2 an additional defendant. Dkt. 26, at 4. The Court also finds that amendment under Federal Rule 3 of Civil Procedure 15 is appropriate because defendant does not assert that the Court should deny 4 the motion and because neither undue delay, bad faith, prejudice, nor futility are apparent. See

5 Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1482 (9th Cir. 1997). 6 Plaintiff shall file the proposed amended complaint (Dkt. 26-1) as the operative 7 complaint in this matter on or before June 24, 2022, in light of plaintiff’s explanation that it 8 must await the close of a sixty-day notice period beginning April 19, 2022. See Dkt. 26, at 4. 9 The Court also finds good cause to strike the scheduling order in this matter, including 10 due to the pendency of the motion to dismiss (Dkt. 12) and the Court’s allowance of an amended 11 complaint adding an additional party. All deadlines previously set forth in the Court’s 12 scheduling order are stricken (Dkt. 24), and within 30 days of the City of Snoqualmie’s 13 appearance, the parties shall confer and file a joint status report to assist the Court in scheduling 14 this matter.

15 Dated this 6th day of June, 2022. A 16 17 J.Richard Creatura Chief United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waste Action Project v. Girard Resources & Recycling LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2022).

Waste Action Project v. Girard Resources & Recycling LLC (Waste Action Project v. Girard Resources & Recycling LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.
715 F.3d 716 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.
114 F.3d 1467 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)