Wassouf v. United States Department of Homeland Security

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 4, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2010-0692
StatusPublished

This text of Wassouf v. United States Department of Homeland Security (Wassouf v. United States Department of Homeland Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wassouf v. United States Department of Homeland Security, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY 04 20\0 Clerk, U.S. District an,: Bankruptcy Courts George Samir Wassouf, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) It t>692 U.S. Dep' t of Homeland Security et aI., ) ) Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on the petitioner's application to proceed without

prepayment of fees, and his pro se habeas petition. The Court will grant the application and will

dismiss the habeas petition because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Petitioner is presently at liberty in Syria. Petition ~ 5. Formerly a permanent legal

resident of the United States, he was convicted of bank fraud in the United States District Court

for the District of New Hampshire, deported, and barred from reentering the United States for a

period often years. Id ~~ 5, 24-25. In this petition, he alleges a variety of illegal acts on the part

of the government in both his criminal and deportation proceedings. See id, e.g., ~~ 25 (alleging

that the federal agents falsified "all" of their affidavits in his criminal case to ensure conviction),

36 (alleging that his immigration judge was "illegally" assigned to the Immigration Court).

The general habeas statute applies only to persons "in custody." 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Petitioner is not in custody, and his attempt to equate his situation as being in custody because he

is barred from entering the United States cannot prevail. See Petition ~ 5. Accordingly, this

petition will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

3 A separate final order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date: ~ J--5fj 2-0 to ~ ;)"i;B uni~es <

District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wassouf v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wassouf-v-united-states-department-of-homeland-sec-dcd-2010.