Wasson v. Hoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wasson v. Hoff

52 A.D. 634, 65 N.Y.S. 1149

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D. 634 (Wasson v. Hoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wasson v. Hoff, 52 A.D. 634, 65 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Ordered, that the order of April twenty-third last, and the judgment entered thereon, dismissing the appeal,'be amended so as to provide that the appeal be dismissed, with caste, including ten dollars costs of the motion, unless the appellant within ten days pays the -cosfcs of the motion; and'procures a stipulatian from tlie respondent opening the default and allowing the case and exceptions to be signed and filed, or serves motion papers for the earliest term practicable for [635]*635an order opening the default, and thereafter proceeds with due diligence to have the case and exceptions signed and filed. See opinion of Williams, J.. in Vandenbergh v. Mathews, decided at the present term (ante, p. 616). All concurrent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered, that the order of April twenty-third last, and the judgment entered thereon, dismissing the appeal,'be amended so as to provide that the appeal be dismissed, with caste, including ten dollars costs of the motion, unless the appellant within ten days pays the -cosfcs of the motion; and'procures a stipulatian from tlie respondent opening the default and allowing the case and exceptions to be signed and filed, or serves motion papers for the earliest term practicable for [635]*635an order opening the default, and thereafter proceeds with due diligence to have the case and exceptions signed and filed. See opinion of Williams, J.. in Vandenbergh v. Mathews, decided at the present term (ante, p. 616). All concurrent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D. 634, 65 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wasson-v-hoff-nyappdiv-1900.