WASSMANN v. Buhler

77 So. 3d 723, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18091, 2011 WL 5554801
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 2011
Docket3D11-1634
StatusPublished

This text of 77 So. 3d 723 (WASSMANN v. Buhler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WASSMANN v. Buhler, 77 So. 3d 723, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18091, 2011 WL 5554801 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the trial court’s award of temporary attorney’s fees in this dissolution case. See Fisher v. Bond, 906 So.2d 1248, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Young v. Young, 898 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Young
898 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Fisher v. Bond
906 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 So. 3d 723, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18091, 2011 WL 5554801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wassmann-v-buhler-fladistctapp-2011.