WASSMANN v. Buhler

77 So. 3d 723, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18091, 2011 WL 5554801
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2011·No. 3D11-1634·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the trial court’s award of temporary attorney’s fees in this dissolution case. See Fisher v. Bond, 906 So.2d 1248, 1249 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Young v. Young, 898 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WASSMANN v. Buhler, 77 So. 3d 723, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18091, 2011 WL 5554801 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

77 So. 3d 723 (WASSMANN v. Buhler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Young
898 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Fisher v. Bond
906 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)