Wassink v. Toner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wassink v. Toner

254 A.D. 817, 6 N.Y.S.2d 151

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial, on the ground that the findings both as to negligence and contributory negligence are against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial, on the ground that the findings both as to negligence and contributory negligence are against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Wassink v. Toner, 254 A.D. 817, 6 N.Y.S.2d 151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 817 (Wassink v. Toner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.