Wassink v. Toner

254 A.D. 817, 6 N.Y.S.2d 151

This text of 254 A.D. 817 (Wassink v. Toner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wassink v. Toner, 254 A.D. 817, 6 N.Y.S.2d 151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial, on the ground that the findings both as to negligence and contributory negligence are against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 817, 6 N.Y.S.2d 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wassink-v-toner-nyappdiv-1938.