Wasserman v. Wasserman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wasserman v. Wasserman

16 A.D.2d 951, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9244

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 951 (Wasserman v. Wasserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wasserman v. Wasserman, 16 A.D.2d 951, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for a stay of order awarding alimony pendente Ute and counsel fee, pending appeal therefrom, granted (1) on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 1,1962 (appeal ordered on the calendar for said term); and (2) on the further condition that appellant pay to respondent $50 a week on account of the alimony, beginning June 15, 1962. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 27, 1962. The amount here directed to be paid as a condition to the granting of the stay is not intended to affect or influence the trial court in any determination it may make respecting alimony. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for a stay of order awarding alimony pendente Ute and counsel fee, pending appeal therefrom, granted (1) on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 1,1962 (appeal ordered on the calendar for said term); and (2) on the further condition that appellant pay to respondent $50 a week on account of the alimony, beginning June 15, 1962. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before August 27, 1962. The amount here directed to be paid as a condition to the granting of the stay is not intended to affect or influence the trial court in any determination it may make respecting alimony. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 951, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wasserman-v-wasserman-nyappdiv-1962.