Wasserman v. State

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 143
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedOctober 13, 1982
DocketNo. 83-CC-0281
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883 (Wasserman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wasserman v. State, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 143 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1982).

Opinion

Poch, J.

On Saturday, March 6, 1982, the Claimant, Paul Wasserman, who resides at 1420 Jonquil Terrace, Chicago, Illinois, was arrested by the Illinois State Police acting pursuant to an arrest warrant issued by the circuit court of Cook County. The arrest was made on the complaint of the Department of Registration and Education which had charged a Paul Wasserman with practicing dentistry without a license. After being handcuffed and removed from his residence, he was placed in a squad car and driven to the Chicago office of the Department for further processing. Only after additional questions was there a determination made that the wrong Paul Wasserman had been arrested.

The State has stipulated that it caused the wrong Paul Wasserman to be arrested and has agreed that this claim should be settled for $5,000.00.

While this Court is not bound by the stipulation, such a stipulation will not be rejected out of hand. It appears that the parties have seriously considered the merits of this claim. Such being the case, the Court allows the stipulation of the parties.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant, Paul Wasserman, be awarded the sum of $5,000.00 as full and final satisfaction arising out of the arrest of the Claimant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 883, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wasserman-v-state-ilclaimsct-1982.