Wasserman v. Schwartz
31 A.2d 820, 130 N.J.L. 176, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 233
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Donges,' Perskie, Dear, Wells, Raffeety, JJ. 6.
For reversal — Case, Bodine, Heher, JJ.1 3.
. For modification — Thompson, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wasserman v. Schwartz, 31 A.2d 820, 130 N.J.L. 176, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 233 (N.J. 1943).
31 A.2d 820 (Wasserman v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green v. Bell Cleaners
167 A.2d 815 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Siciliano v. United States
85 F. Supp. 726 (D. New Jersey, 1949)