Wasserfallen v. Strifler

D.C. Circuit

Wasserfallen v. Strifler

272 F. 1021, 50 App. D.C. 402, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1921

DocketNo. 1415

StatusPublished

This text of 272 F. 1021 (Wasserfallen v. Strifler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wasserfallen v. Strifler, 272 F. 1021, 50 App. D.C. 402, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding involving an invention for attachments to automobiles for carrying spare rims and tires. The case turns solely upon issues of fact. The tribunals of the Patent Office concurred in awarding priority to Strifler. A careful review of the record convinces us that no error has been committed. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice HITZ, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat in the place of Mr. Justice ROBB.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding involving an invention for attachments to automobiles for carrying spare rims and tires. The case turns solely upon issues of fact. The tribunals of the Patent Office concurred in awarding priority to Strifler. A careful review of the record convinces us that no error has been committed. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice HITZ, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat in the place of Mr. Justice ROBB.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 F. 1021, 50 App. D.C. 402, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wasserfallen-v-strifler-cadc-1921.