Wassel v. Gautchey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Wassel v. Gautchey

133 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 514, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179

DecidedMay 18, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A. 925 (Wassel v. Gautchey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wassel v. Gautchey, 133 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 514, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

This case is before the court on a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue to the building inspector in a zoning case, an agreed state of facts is submitted to the court, in writing, duly signed by the respective attorneys and filed. Upon reading and answering the facts we. are satisfied the cases controlled by the case of State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389; affirmed, 98 Id., 712, as being directly in point. A rule may be entered, therefore, directing a peremptory writ of mandamus to issue to the building inspector of the borough of Hawthorne, Passaic county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

This case is before the court on a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue to the building inspector in a zoning case, an agreed state of facts is submitted to the court, in writing, duly signed by the respective attorneys and filed. Upon reading and answering the facts we. are satisfied the cases controlled by the case of State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389; affirmed, 98 Id., 712, as being directly in point. A rule may be entered, therefore, directing a peremptory writ of mandamus to issue to the building inspector of the borough of Hawthorne, Passaic county.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 514, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wassel-v-gautchey-nj-1926.