Wasniewski v. Quick & Reilly, Inc.

950 A.2d 1291, 287 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 227
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 28, 2008
DocketSC 18160
StatusPublished

This text of 950 A.2d 1291 (Wasniewski v. Quick & Reilly, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wasniewski v. Quick & Reilly, Inc., 950 A.2d 1291, 287 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 227 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 379 (AC 28063), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[914]*914The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18160. Decided May 28, 2008 Thomas J. Sansone, in support of the petition.

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that valid delivery of an inter vivos gift was effected by the plaintiffs father to the plaintiff?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the plaintiff was the intended third party beneficiary of any alleged contract entered into between the plaintiffs father and the defendant?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wasniewski v. Quick and Reilly, Inc.
940 A.2d 811 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 A.2d 1291, 287 Conn. 913, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wasniewski-v-quick-reilly-inc-conn-2008.