Waslaski v. State
This text of 2015 ND 30 (Waslaski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/12/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 30
Edward Waslaski, Jr., Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140245
Appeal from the District Court of Pembina County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Rhiannon L. Gorham, P.O. Box 6306, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-6306, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.
Stephenie L. Davis, McKenzie County Assistant State’s Attorney, 201 Fifth Street NW, Suite 550, Watford City, N.D. 58854, for respondent and appellee; on brief.
Waslaski v. State
[¶1] Edward Waslaski appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Waslaski claims he is entitled to post-conviction relief because his counsel represented his co-defendants and advised him to plead guilty to multiple charges to ensure a better outcome for the group of defendants rather than for his individual interests. Waslaski previously sought post-conviction relief in Waslaski v. State , 2013 ND 56, 828 N.W.2d 787. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding that, following an evidentiary hearing, the district court did not err in dismissing on the grounds of misuse of process Waslaski’s application for post-conviction relief.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waslaski-v-state-nd-2015.