Waskam v. Waskam

31 Miss. 154
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 Miss. 154 (Waskam v. Waskam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waskam v. Waskam, 31 Miss. 154 (Mich. 1856).

Opinion

Per curiam.

— This was a bill by the appellant in the Yice Chancery Court holden at Yazoo city, against the appellee, for a divorce a mensa et thoro.

The allegations of the bill do not show that the appellee had been guilty of such extreme cruelty as is necessary to bring the case within the operation of the statute. It shows the appellee to be a man of intemperate habits, and of such manners and conduct as would necessarily be produced by such habits. But mere intemperance in a man’s habits, harshness of manner, and, in the language of the hill, indecency of conduct, are not sufficient. The cruelty must be something more than mere injuries to a person’s sensibility or sense of delicacy.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ring v. Ring
62 L.R.A. 878 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Anonymous
17 Abb. N. Cas. 231 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Miss. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waskam-v-waskam-miss-1856.