Washita Consolidated School Dist. No. 20 v. Arlington School Supply Co.

1926 OK 777, 249 P. 725, 121 Okla. 266, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 133
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 28, 1926
Docket17677
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1926 OK 777 (Washita Consolidated School Dist. No. 20 v. Arlington School Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washita Consolidated School Dist. No. 20 v. Arlington School Supply Co., 1926 OK 777, 249 P. 725, 121 Okla. 266, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 133 (Okla. 1926).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in error has filed its motion to dismiss herein, on the ground that the appeal was not lodged in this court within the time requited by section 798, C. O. S. 1921, which is, in part;

“All proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of. * * *”

The motion for new trial was overruled on February 4, 1926, and the appeal was lodged in this court on August 5, 1926. The time for filing the appeal in this court commenced to run on the 5th day of February, 1926, and expired at the end of the 4th day of August, 1926. When the appeal is not filed within six months from the date the judgment or final order is rendered, this-court cannot acquire jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massad v. Heide
1932 OK 860 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK 777, 249 P. 725, 121 Okla. 266, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washita-consolidated-school-dist-no-20-v-arlington-school-supply-co-okla-1926.