Washington v. Washington

69 S.E. 322, 111 Va. 524, 1910 Va. LEXIS 79
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedNovember 17, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 322 (Washington v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington v. Washington, 69 S.E. 322, 111 Va. 524, 1910 Va. LEXIS 79 (Va. 1910).

Opinion

Harrison, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This bill was filed by Ida A. Washington to obtain a divorce from her husband, Henry Washington, on the ground of desertion.

The statute provides that where either party wilfully deserts or abandons the other for three years, a divorce from the bond of matrimony may be decreed (Code, 1904, sec. 2257) ; and further provides that where desertion is the ground, the husband or wife may testify. Code, 1904, sec. 3346a.

[525]*525The uncontradicted evidence in this case shows that without cause the defendant has abandoned his wife continuously for five or six years; that during that time he has not cohabited with her, and has- contributed nothing toward her support, but has left her to shift for herself, although she has endeavored to induce him to return and live with her. We are of opinion that these facts constitute such proof of desertion as entitles the appellant to a decree of divorce from the bond of matrimony. Wherever there is an actual breaking off of matrimonial cohabitation, combined with the intent to desert in the mind of the offender, in such case desertion is established, long continued absence without detaining cause being the most potent means of proof of the intent to desert. Harris v. Harris, 31 Gratt. 13, 29; Latham v. Latham, 30 Gratt. 307; Carr v. Carr, 22 Gratt. 168; Bailey v. Bailey, 21 Gratt. 43.

The circuit court having denied the divorce, its decree must be reversed and the cause remanded for a decree to be entered in conformity with this opinion.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael J. Hill v. Brittney M. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2018
Branscome v. Schaus
73 Va. Cir. 1 (Nelson County Circuit Court, 2006)
Ramsay v. Ramsay
21 Va. Cir. 441 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 1990)
Bowman v. Bowman
22 S.E.2d 29 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1942)
Byerly v. Byerly
140 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1927)
Dinsmore v. Dinsmore
104 S.E. 785 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1920)
Johnson v. Johnson
85 S.E. 475 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1915)
Lee v. Lee
112 Va. 719 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 322, 111 Va. 524, 1910 Va. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-washington-va-1910.