Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Fourth Circuit

Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

229 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2007·No. No. 07-1038·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carmansita Washington appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant WMATA’s motion for summary judgment in Washington’s personal injury action arising out of a slip and fall incident. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. l:06-cv-00358-CMH-BR (E.D.Va. Dec. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carmansita Washington appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant WMATA’s motion for summary judgment in Washington’s personal injury action arising out of a slip and fall incident. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. l:06-cv-00358-CMH-BR (E.D.Va. Dec. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 229 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

229 F. App'x 271 (Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.