Washington v. US Bank, NA

Missouri Court of Appeals

Washington v. US Bank, NA

269 S.W.3d 545, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1405

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 14, 2008·No. No. ED 90995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorthea Washington appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of U.S. Bank on her petition for the discovery of assets seeking to recover over $209,000 in unauthorized disbursements from her deceased husband’s accounts. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorthea Washington appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of U.S. Bank on her petition for the discovery of assets seeking to recover over $209,000 in unauthorized disbursements from her deceased husband’s accounts. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Washington v. US Bank, NA, 269 S.W.3d 545, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1405 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

269 S.W.3d 545 (Washington v. US Bank, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.