Washington v. United States

584 U.S. 837, 138 S. Ct. 1832, 201 L. Ed. 2d 200, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3501
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 11, 2018·No. 17-269·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 584 U. S. ____ (2018) 1

Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________

No. 17–269 _________________

WASHINGTON, PETITIONER v.

UNITED STATES, ET AL.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

[June 11, 2018]

PER CURIAM. The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE KENNEDY took no part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. United States, 584 U.S. 837, 138 S. Ct. 1832, 201 L. Ed. 2d 200, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3501 (2018).

584 U.S. 837 (Washington v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Sammamish v. Titcomb
Washington Supreme Court, 2024
Coastal Conservation Ass'n v. State of N.C.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
United States v. Kernen Constr.
349 F. Supp. 3d 988 (E.D. California, 2018)