Washington v. United States

Supreme Court

Washington v. United States

444 U.S. 816, 100 S. Ct. 34

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 1, 1979·No. No. 78-119·Published·Cited by 44 cases

Opinion

443 U. S. 658. Upon consideration of the motion of the State of Washington for modification of the opinion of this Court, the memorandum filed by the respondent tribes, the memorandum filed by the United States and the reply thereto, it is ordered that footnote 16 of the opinion be modified as follows:

"A factual dispute exists on the question of what percentage of the fish in the case area actually passes through Indian fishing areas and is therefore subject to the District Court’s allocations. In the absence of any [817]*817relevant findings by the courts below, we are unable to express any view on the matter.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

443 U. S. 658. Upon consideration of the motion of the State of Washington for modification of the opinion of this Court, the memorandum filed by the respondent tribes, the memorandum filed by the United States and the reply thereto, it is ordered that footnote 16 of the opinion be modified as follows:

"A factual dispute exists on the question of what percentage of the fish in the case area actually passes through Indian fishing areas and is therefore subject to the District Court’s allocations. In the absence of any [817]*817relevant findings by the courts below, we are unable to express any view on the matter.”

Washington v. United States, 444 U.S. 816, 100 S. Ct. 34 (1979).

Pincite

444 U.S. 816 (Washington v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4339, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6729 United States of America Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Tulalip Tribe Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, and Washington Harvest Divers Association Tom McMahon Intervenors-Appellants. United States of America Muckleshoot Tribe Nooksack Upper Skagit Squaxin Island Lummi Indian Tribe Makah Tribe Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Tulalip Tribe Puyallup Tribe Quileute Indian Tribe Hoh Indian Tribe Suquamish Tribe Quinault Indian Nation Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Nisqually Indian Tribe v. State of Washington, and Inner Sound Crab Association Edward Knudson Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association Ernest Summers, Intervenors-Appellants

86 F.3d 1499 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)

Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corporation

25 F.3d 773 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor v. Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission

4 F.3d 490 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)

Opinion

Related