Washington v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Washington v. United States

56 F. App'x 513

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 2003

DocketNo. 02-2511

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. App'x 513 (Washington v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. United States, 56 F. App'x 513 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[514]*514 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 19, 2002, be affirmed. The court correctly held that appellant’s complaints do not satisfy Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[514]*514 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 19, 2002, be affirmed. The court correctly held that appellant’s complaints do not satisfy Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F. App'x 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-united-states-cadc-2003.