Washington v. Turner

Utah Supreme Court

Washington v. Turner

412 P.2d 449, 17 Utah 2d 361, 1966 Utah LEXIS 479

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1966

DocketNo. 10427

StatusPublished

This text of 412 P.2d 449 (Washington v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. Turner, 412 P.2d 449, 17 Utah 2d 361, 1966 Utah LEXIS 479 (Utah 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

WADE, Justice.

Walter Alfonzo Washington brings this appeal from a judgment of the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, which refused to grant him a writ of habeas corpus releasing him from a prison sentence for burglary in the second degree. He claims that the evidence conclusively shows that he had nothing to do with the burglary. He admits that he drove two other men around in the neighborhood of the Vrontikis store but knew nothing about their intention to burglarize that store. He claims that on the advice of his lawyer he did not take the witness stand and testify in his own behalf. Appellant insists that his counsel at the trial was incompetent.

Appellant for the first time on this appeal claims that the trial court denied him access to the transcript of the record. He does not state whether this claimed denial of the record was of the preliminary hearing or of the main trial. There is no showing of any such denial. That issue was not raised in the trial court and cannot be raised for the first time now. We find no evidence of incompetency or action in bad faith in this matter. The judgment denying the writ is affirmed. No costs awarded.

HENRIOD, C. J., and McDONOUGH, CROCKETT, and CALLISTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WADE, Justice.

Walter Alfonzo Washington brings this appeal from a judgment of the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, which refused to grant him a writ of habeas corpus releasing him from a prison sentence for burglary in the second degree. He claims that the evidence conclusively shows that he had nothing to do with the burglary. He admits that he drove two other men around in the neighborhood of the Vrontikis store but knew nothing about their intention to burglarize that store. He claims that on the advice of his lawyer he did not take the witness stand and testify in his own behalf. Appellant insists that his counsel at the trial was incompetent.

Appellant for the first time on this appeal claims that the trial court denied him access to the transcript of the record. He does not state whether this claimed denial of the record was of the preliminary hearing or of the main trial. There is no showing of any such denial. That issue was not raised in the trial court and cannot be raised for the first time now. We find no evidence of incompetency or action in bad faith in this matter. The judgment denying the writ is affirmed. No costs awarded.

HENRIOD, C. J., and McDONOUGH, CROCKETT, and CALLISTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 P.2d 449, 17 Utah 2d 361, 1966 Utah LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-turner-utah-1966.