Washington v. State
435 P.3d 366
Opinion
/s/
MICHAEL K. DAVIS
Chief Justice
Justices Fox and Boomgaarden would have denied appellate counsel's motion to withdraw and ordered counsel to file a brief addressing the merits of this appeal. Specifically, appellate counsel should have considered whether Appellant, at arraignment, was properly advised regarding the number of counts charged and the potential penalties. See Stalcup v. State ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. State, 435 P.3d 366 (Wyo. 2019).
435 P.3d 366 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Christopher Mark Nesius v. The State of Wyoming
2019 WY 129 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2019)