Washington v. State
This text of 435 P.3d 366 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
/s/
MICHAEL K. DAVIS
Chief Justice
Justices Fox and Boomgaarden would have denied appellate counsel's motion to withdraw and ordered counsel to file a brief addressing the merits of this appeal. Specifically, appellate counsel should have considered whether Appellant, at arraignment, was properly advised regarding the number of counts charged and the potential penalties. See Stalcup v. State ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 P.3d 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-wyo-2019.