Washington v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.

First Circuit

Washington v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.

55 F. App'x 7

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJanuary 31, 2003

Docket02-1535

StatusPublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 7 (Washington v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., 55 F. App'x 7 (1st Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pro se appellant Keith Washington has a timely appeal solely with respect to a March 12, 2002 order denying Washington’s motion for leave to file a summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The motion at issue was filed over *8 two years after summary judgment was granted in favor of defendants and the case was closed. The district court has denied repeated motions to reopen the case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Under the circumstances, the motion for leave to file pursuant to Rule 56(c) was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pro se appellant Keith Washington has a timely appeal solely with respect to a March 12, 2002 order denying Washington’s motion for leave to file a summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The motion at issue was filed over *8 two years after summary judgment was granted in favor of defendants and the case was closed. The district court has denied repeated motions to reopen the case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Under the circumstances, the motion for leave to file pursuant to Rule 56(c) was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. App'x 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-street-bank-trust-co-ca1-2003.