Washington v. State

199 S.W.3d 218, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2006 WL 2471595
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. No. WD 65754·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Isaiah Washington appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 199 S.W.3d 218, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2006 WL 2471595 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

199 S.W.3d 218 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.